Sample report
What a Veridium findings report looks like.
Clear, specific and written for compliance leadership. Below is the structure, with an anonymised illustrative extract.
A downloadable sample report is available on request. Request the sample report.
Report structure
Executive summary
Headline conclusions in a page.Scope
Sample, standards used and limitations.Overall observations
The general picture across files.Case-level findings
Findings per file, graded.Recurring themes
Patterns across the sample.Priority actions
What to fix first.Recommendations
Practical changes to make.
Illustrative example only. Anonymised; not based on a real client or file.
Findings report: extractIllustrative
Executive summary
Across the 10 files reviewed, identity verification was consistently evidenced. The main weaknesses were the recording of rationale for screening outcomes and the evidencing of ownership and control for layered entities.
Case-level findings
| File | Area | Observation | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case 03 | Beneficial ownership | Ownership percentages recorded; control through other means not considered or evidenced. | Medium |
| Case 06 | Screening | Possible match cleared with no recorded reason for discounting. | High |
| Case 08 | Audit trail | Approval recorded without a note of the risk rating basis. | Low |
Recurring themes
- Screening dispositions record the outcome but not the reasoning (3 of 10 files).
- Control over entities is assessed inconsistently between analysts (2 of 10 files).
Priority actions
- Introduce a minimum rationale standard for screening dispositions.
- Add a prompt to the ownership template covering control other than shareholding.
Figures and findings above are illustrative and shown only to demonstrate format.
Want an independent view of your KYC process?
Start with a short conversation about your current onboarding environment and what you would like reviewed.